PDA

View Full Version : Is it ok to use a second billing options on a 3rd party payout revshare program?

spann0
09-18-06, 01:12 PM
is it ok if a program that pays via a 3rd party on a revshare has secondary billing options on the denial url's ?

so say you send a surfer and CCBILL declines them is it ok for them to then send them to a secondary processor which they can't payout to you on?
Elisha Jade
09-18-06, 01:15 PM
Err no.

Surely all the payment options should be payable to the affiliate.
spann0
09-18-06, 01:17 PM
Err no.

Surely all the payment options should be payable to the affiliate.

yes obviouslly I don't mean on the form I mean on a denial from the processor say CCBILL
Elisha Jade
09-18-06, 01:18 PM
I can see many affiliates getting twitchy about that.

We alternate between paycom/ccbill being our primary - if ones denied it takes you to the other one, and affiliates get paid either way.
JT
09-18-06, 01:19 PM
No its not OK.

If I send you a customer and your processor cant or wont proccess it and pay me out. Then I want him back to I can try and sell him to another product
spann0
09-18-06, 01:28 PM
No its not OK.

If I send you a customer and your processor cant or wont proccess it and pay me out. Then I want him back to I can try and sell him to another product

ahh ok I see your point
NumptyNuts
09-18-06, 07:21 PM
is it ok if a program that pays via a 3rd party on a revshare has secondary billing options on the denial url's ?

so say you send a surfer and CCBILL declines them is it ok for them to then send them to a secondary processor which they can't payout to you on?

thats why we have things like Nats & MPA3 - so you can cascade without shaving.

Funny you should bring it up Panchdog said they were offing a CCBill only programme again due to demand, they only went it along within the past 12 months or so.