dvtimes
08-30-06, 10:31 PM
Today's Porn Laws - My verdict
OK, my mortal friends I shall give my verdict.
Basically two things will happen.
1. Nothing. I suspect the CPS will not bother with cases as they are not winnable.
You see you will have cases were people simply fake pics, which it will be daft to prosecute.
Plus any bondage sites will (if they have sense) try to be arrested simply for publicity.
And also what about films. Many classics have abuse in them. Look at clockwork orange.
Sure the public gave support on the question 'should we ban violent porn'. Its the same when you ask 'should we bring back hanging'. Many will support it, but when you then ask who should you hang, people cannot decide.
I can see artists going to court.
Its as workable as the fox hunting laws.
2. It will be used as a possible lesser sentence for rapists. By this were they do not have enough evidence to charge a rapist for rape, but they may at least get a conviction if they posses violent porn.
But the problem with the law is that it shall not prevent a rape or murder. Rather take up police time and waste money to charge people. To search a pc is very costly.
In other words, police who would be targeting cp, will be going after some person who has a few pics on his pc.
I would even suspect many people to have such pics on there pc of discs from downloading porn over the years without even remembering.
OK, my mortal friends I shall give my verdict.
Basically two things will happen.
1. Nothing. I suspect the CPS will not bother with cases as they are not winnable.
You see you will have cases were people simply fake pics, which it will be daft to prosecute.
Plus any bondage sites will (if they have sense) try to be arrested simply for publicity.
And also what about films. Many classics have abuse in them. Look at clockwork orange.
Sure the public gave support on the question 'should we ban violent porn'. Its the same when you ask 'should we bring back hanging'. Many will support it, but when you then ask who should you hang, people cannot decide.
I can see artists going to court.
Its as workable as the fox hunting laws.
2. It will be used as a possible lesser sentence for rapists. By this were they do not have enough evidence to charge a rapist for rape, but they may at least get a conviction if they posses violent porn.
But the problem with the law is that it shall not prevent a rape or murder. Rather take up police time and waste money to charge people. To search a pc is very costly.
In other words, police who would be targeting cp, will be going after some person who has a few pics on his pc.
I would even suspect many people to have such pics on there pc of discs from downloading porn over the years without even remembering.