The Hun just past 20 billion page views

[Shandy McAndy]

I just read on another site that The Hun past the 20 billion page views marker. Thats alot of free porn :mad:

[Cardinal_Sin]

I just read on another site that The Hun past the 20 billion page views marker. Thats alot of free porn :mad:


His traffic is 99.5% crap - However, because of the numbers he is doing, that 0.5% is well worth the bandwidth you burn.

[drunken]

I always make a fair few sales from the hun...however I have to agree his traffic lately, last 6 months or so, has gone downhill imo

[mellenig]

His traffic is 99.5% crap - However, because of the numbers he is doing, that 0.5% is well worth the bandwidth you burn.

i havent bought any spots on the hun for about 9 months but used to do really well with him.

[Elisha Jade]

Depending on the gallery I always make a few sales off there too. Once I had 8 sales from there in one day to one of the BBW sites i run but that was a rare occurance!!

[ukwebmasters]

the hun is dead wood in 2005

[Rosie]

I've not found that hun traffic is any worse at converting for me than in previous years - however some galleries work well for me and some don't.... It isn't always obvious what's going to sell and what isn't. I've just had 10 sales from a Koko Li Shadowslaves gallery, whereas another Koko Li gallery last week got me just four.

[ukwebmasters]

rosie, on your index page for shadowslaves, the girl top right >> is that shit in her hair and all over her face? ... or spag bol? lmfao

[Rosie]

Spag bol!!! Mind you I'd cooked it the night before and I'm no cook - so it could be considered shit I guess ;)

[ukwebmasters]

thought it looked familiar... gr8 stuff!

[JT]

I still think pound for pound the traffic on the hun is good. I wouldnt pay for a listing, its not good enough in my opinion. I just got a confirmation this morning of a listing.

E-mail: support@sex4cash.com
Submission: http://www.facialshark.com/kim/galleries3/index5.html
Submitted: 2005-06-08 01:49:49


Your gallery is accepted. It will be on-line soon (could be anywhere between 1 day to a month)

The Hun

I'll let you know how it goes :drink:

[-HF]

I still think pound for pound the traffic on the hun is good. I wouldnt pay for a listing, its not good enough in my opinion. I just got a confirmation this morning of a listing.

I'll let you know how it goes :drink:

is it sposed to look like that? and the links leading me to the main URL ?

[JT]

is it sposed to look like that? and the links leading me to the main URL ?

Nope, its not for me. You use Nortons as your firewall? maybe its a HT access issue

[-HF]

i had every security measurement taken down before i did the screen shots.

[JT]

i had every security measurement taken down before i did the screen shots.

How bizare, Ive just got someone else to look on ICQ and they see its fine too, though the screan shot that the pics link to would be a 404 page maybe. hmmm How bizare. Anyone else see it like HF does?

[-HF]

but don't worry too much, i know our ISP is overly picky when it comes to server settings, especially DNS entries. might just be another case of that. there are a few sites we cannot access properly.

[mellenig]

just checked it looks fine all thumbs go where they are supposed too.

[Gnat69]

I have made a few sales there too and the funny thing I submitted a crappy site and it did well....

The Hun also signed up under me to be their Rep, but we all know they wasted their time signing up since they don't do anything with it and the fact that they have never returned my emails, so at this point I think the HUN is just hype now.....

[mellenig]

the hun is dead wood in 2005

Just wondering how do you come to that conclusion?

the site is European owned (and hosted I think) wont be affected by 2257, the most popular extension is .net wont be affected by .xxx. The site is made up of virtually all bookmarkers. And last time I checked his spots had a waiting list of 4-6 months which is not too bad since he charges $500 a day for his no1 spot.

[SGS]

Nope, its not for me. You use Nortons as your firewall? maybe its a HT access issue

Looks like an .htaccess issue I think.