PDA

View Full Version : New girls.

absolutte
03-07-06, 12:17 PM
What do you think about these new girls. Would you shoot them?


http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/New-girl-01.jpg
http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/New-girl-02.jpg
http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/New-girl-03.jpg
absolutte
03-07-06, 12:18 PM
http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/New-girl-04.jpg
http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/New-girl-05.jpg
http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/New-girl-06.jpg
JT
03-07-06, 12:34 PM
There not that bad that they need to be shot. I think thats a bit harsh
spann0
03-07-06, 12:34 PM
I think they are kinda ugly to do porn sorry
matt
03-07-06, 12:54 PM
The top pic in the second post looks okay, I wouln't buy content of the others unless it involved clowns.
Shandy McAndy
03-07-06, 12:59 PM
What do you think about these new girls. Would you shoot them?

Yes with a 12 bore
Joe A
03-07-06, 01:38 PM
They're nothing special

a) I presume as it's for Paul Markham they're not English

b) What levels do they work to ?

c) Both have slightly droopy boobs
fredicus
03-07-06, 01:42 PM
The first blonde has a nice smile, and is the best of the bunch IMO.
:gallery:
daveydude
03-07-06, 02:37 PM
They all look a bit grim to be fair.
Guest
03-07-06, 02:44 PM
Nothing special, but stick them in some kinky boots and I'm interested ;)
-HF
03-07-06, 03:48 PM
[COLOR=Purple]http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/New-girl-03.jpg
i dig bra marks.
SGS
03-07-06, 05:20 PM
Middle pic of the first one makes her look "special needs"

They look fine though.
Jock Strap
03-07-06, 08:01 PM
I think they're all fantastic....
but that's just me.
dvtimes
03-07-06, 08:30 PM
I think they look fine.

but lets face it, you just posted them to remind us all that you sell content, rather than care what we think of the models.
Jock Strap
03-07-06, 08:52 PM
I think they look fine.

but lets face it, you just posted them to remind us all that you sell content, rather than care what we think of the models.

That's what I like about DVT.
He cuts through the bullshit.:)
SGS
03-07-06, 09:07 PM
Ikea, the set builders friend. We even have an account there now. :)
Shandy McAndy
03-07-06, 09:31 PM
I think they look fine.

but lets face it, you just posted them to remind us all that you sell content, rather than care what we think of the models.

DV, Im not sure what you are doing these days, but I find myself agreeing with you more and more!

The only thing I dont agree with is the part that they look fine. They look like retards to me and who ever the photographer was needs to go back to college. The models were rough the photography was worse.

Please shoot them as promised and include the photographer
gawdi
03-07-06, 09:43 PM
Another 20 yrs and they might be ok for my sites.....
dvtimes
03-07-06, 09:51 PM
I think the girls look nice.

But to say its done in a studio, your right not great pics.

If your going to shoot in your own studio, and you plan on selling the shots, then you should expect better quality.

But, I still think the girls look nice. But then again if they are from the check repuplic, most of the girls do look nice anyway.
-HF
03-07-06, 10:13 PM
But then again if they are from the check repuplic, most of the girls do look nice anyway.
i still wonder where that myth came from.
dvtimes
03-07-06, 10:18 PM
i still wonder where that myth came from.

What myth? I thought he worked in the check republic!!!

Or do you mean about check republic girls being attractive? Well most Euopian girls are.
absolutte
03-07-06, 10:18 PM
I think the girls look nice.

But to say its done in a studio, your right not great pics.

If your going to shoot in your own studio, and you plan on selling the shots, then you should expect better quality.

But, I still think the girls look nice. But then again if they are from the check repuplic, most of the girls do look nice anyway.

These are just casting pics and our new girl who we are training to be a photographer took them, so maybe this is why they donīt look any profesional.

If you would look at our work youīll fine that we know what quality it needs.

But anyway, these girls are from Czech republic.
absolutte
03-07-06, 10:22 PM
I think they look fine.

but lets face it, you just posted them to remind us all that you sell content, rather than care what we think of the models.


Thatś what you think, but as I said, these are just casting pics and I am not sure about these girls if they worth another shoot, so I thought itīs a good idea to ask people. Maybe it wasnīt.
dvtimes
03-07-06, 10:24 PM
I wonder if studio lights were used?

The pics do feel a bit flat.

I am no photographer I know, but then again I am not shooting to sell.

But these shots just do not have that pow feel that you should get from a studio shoot.

Also there are spots on the shots. These must be from the camera as they are not in the same place. If you look at the 2nd pic, there is a spot on the right of the pic, but in the 3rd shot its above the pic (on the wall).
-HF
03-07-06, 10:26 PM
What myth?
the prettyness of czech females.

been there twice, but the street hookers right after the border looked more tempting than most other females.

of course beauty, like quality of pictures or skills of an artist, are in the eye of the beer holder and often rated much much higher by the artist or the model than the rest of the world.
dvtimes
03-07-06, 10:26 PM
I think the firsdt girl stands out. She has a rather sexy mouth and a bit of a 'posh' look.

I think if it was me, I would do several sets of her outside, say in riding gear and such like.
dvtimes
03-07-06, 10:50 PM
Check your camera. If its not dust on the lense, it may be time for a new camera.
dvtimes
03-07-06, 10:53 PM
But I do think she has a nice face/mouth.

I have lightened it a bit, so you can see her eyes now.
absolutte
03-07-06, 10:55 PM
I wonder if studio lights were used?

The pics do feel a bit flat.

I am no photographer I know, but then again I am not shooting to sell.

But these shots just do not have that pow feel that you should get from a studio shoot.

Also there are spots on the shots. These must be from the camera as they are not in the same place. If you look at the 2nd pic, there is a spot on the right of the pic, but in the 3rd shot its above the pic (on the wall).

I guess that some light was used, couse the first pics are burned out a bit. But again, amateur girl shot it.

And you are right, need to clean the camera.
dvtimes
03-07-06, 10:58 PM
I guess that some light was used, couse the first pics are burned out a bit. But again, amateur girl shot it.

And you are right, need to clean the camera.

It could be the chip on the camera thats faulty. I had an old digital that did the same thing.

With look its just a bit of sirt on the lense, as a faulty chip could mean the end of the camera.
absolutte
03-07-06, 10:59 PM
I think the firsdt girl stands out. She has a rather sexy mouth and a bit of a 'posh' look.

I think if it was me, I would do several sets of her outside, say in riding gear and such like.

Yes, if I would shoot her, I would get much more of her. But then you never know.
absolutte
03-07-06, 11:01 PM
It could be the chip on the camera thats faulty. I had an old digital that did the same thing.

With look its just a bit of sirt on the lense, as a faulty chip could mean the end of the camera.

I think that itīs just a dust or some dirt on the lense, it happened to me before as well. Will get it cleaned.
Geezer
03-07-06, 11:47 PM
I am no photographer

Now there's an understatement :gaylords:
dvtimes
03-08-06, 12:00 AM
Now there's an understatement :gaylords:

ho ho ho

(a few from me (http://media.libsyn.com/media/sneezwort/pics4.zip))

ooops, just remembered I took some pics in a month ago. I best go get them in the morning.
-HF
03-08-06, 12:18 AM
Check your camera. If its not dust on the lense, it may be time for a new camera.
jizz stains.
heidi84
03-08-06, 09:42 AM
There not that bad that they need to be shot. I think thats a bit harsh

haha lmao!

i think its a case of 'nice tits shame about the face'
xcite-tv
03-08-06, 07:02 PM
There not that bad that they need to be shot. I think thats a bit harsh


Oh i dunno !!!
xcite-tv
03-08-06, 07:04 PM
ho ho ho

(a few from me (http://media.libsyn.com/media/sneezwort/pics4.zip))

ooops, just remembered I took some pics in a month ago. I best go get them in the morning.

GO get them ?????? dont you know we have moved from 110mm to Polaroids now .
xcite-tv
03-08-06, 07:05 PM
haha lmao!

i think its a case of 'nice tits shame about the face'


and the tits are awfull...

but on the bright side PM has someone else posting for him...no more arrogant shite to endure
-HF
03-08-06, 10:34 PM
and the tits are awfull...

but on the bright side PM has someone else posting for him...no more arrogant shite to endure
you reckon?
If you would look at our work youīll fine that we know what quality it needs.
just cause it's not padded out with cocky attacks doesn't make it less arrogant. :cheers2:
Paul Markham
03-09-06, 09:17 AM
It could be the chip on the camera thats faulty. I had an old digital that did the same thing.

With look its just a bit of sirt on the lense, as a faulty chip could mean the end of the camera.
We get the chips cleaned reguarly.
Geezer
03-09-06, 09:37 AM
haha lmao!

i think its a case of 'nice tits shame about the face'

That's not nice, taking the piss about the way a girl looks who has her pic posted on a public board.
xcite-tv
03-09-06, 01:02 PM
you reckon?

just cause it's not padded out with cocky attacks doesn't make it less arrogant. :cheers2:


well he has time to learn from the master of unplaced arrogance i suppose
-HF
03-09-06, 01:34 PM
That's not nice, taking the piss about the way a girl looks who has her pic posted on a public board.
i concur, that comment was rather appalling.