Greenpeace spastic gets owned! (vid)

[tdf]

Lord Monckton is my new hero, video speaks for itself

YouTube- Lord Monckton Educates Greenpeace-campaigner on global warming

[strictlybroadband]

Those scientists are soooo stupid. They never get anything right.

Except aeroplanes, computers, engines, dams, evolution, gravity, submarines, modern medicene, the internet, television, electricity... n stuff.

[strictlybroadband]

The APS further added a disclaimer to the top of Monckton's article stating: "...Its conclusions are in disagreement with the overwhelming opinion of the world scientific community. The Council of the American Physical Society disagrees with this article's conclusions." In a response, Monckton called the APS "red flag" "discourteous" and claimed his paper had been "scientifically reviewed in meticulous detail". Notwithstanding, Arthur Smith, long-time member at the APS Forum, has identified 125 errors, irrelevancies, and contradictions in the article.

(But what do scientists know?)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Monckton,_3rd_Viscount_Monckton_of_Bre nchley#Views_on_AIDS

[Shandy McAndy]

(But what do scientists know?)


This from the person who believes all the scientists working on the twin towers building were wrong?

Oh I see because that suited you at the time and now it suits you to say scientists are always right.

Oh apart from the fact that 20 years ago the scientists were saying that we had the next ice age coming

[strictlybroadband]

This from the person who believes all the scientists working on the twin towers building were wrong?

Huh? I think you're mixing me up with someone else.

Oh apart from the fact that 20 years ago the scientists were saying that we had the next ice age coming

Really? Which scientists?

[strictlybroadband]

Very timely... today, The Express published a front page article called 100 Reasons Why Global Warming Is Natural (http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/146139).

New Scientist have just published a reply to it called 50 Reasons Why Global Warming Isn't Natural (http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2009/12/50-reasons-why-global-warming.html)

I'm expecting the Express to change stance and publish "100 reasons why global warming is caused by immigrants".

[happychappy]

I'm expecting the Express to change stance and publish "100 reasons why global warming is caused by immigrants".

Who showed you tomorrow's Daily Mail!!:noway2:

[JT]

very timely... Today, the express published a front page article called 100 reasons why global warming is natural (http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/146139).

New scientist have just published a reply to it called 50 reasons why global warming isn't natural (http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2009/12/50-reasons-why-global-warming.html)

i'm expecting the express to change stance and publish "100 reasons why global warming is caused by immigrants".


lol

[redwhiteandblue]

Very timely... today, The Express published a front page article called 100 Reasons Why Global Warming Is Natural (http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/146139).

New Scientist have just published a reply to it called 50 Reasons Why Global Warming Isn't Natural (http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2009/12/50-reasons-why-global-warming.html)


But 100 > 50, so the Daily Express WINS!!!

[Damian]

But 100 > 50, so the Daily Express WINS!!!

genuine laugh out loud. thanks.