View Full Version : My answer to the weather problems ( waiting for the men in white suits)
xcite-tv
10-19-05, 04:10 PM
do you really think insignificant beings like us can cause climate change on a global scale...The climate of this planet changes naturally and has done for millions of years.. We think far to highly of our own species !!!
I have read that the north and south poles and the whole earths magnetic field will flip (total 180 degree change) this is caused by the planet passing through a photon beam. This process takes years and has already started.
The year 2012 is the one to watch for (allegedly)
The effect on climate, animal and human life will be immense.
But here's the good news. and the unbelievable bit!!
those of us that come out the other side will be better human beings
something to to with a higher level of conciousness, apparantly.
It is said that those people already know who they are.
This is of course all being kept from us and we shall continue to blame the C02 emmisions and mainly the evil car..... for a massive change in the weather......Bollocks !!!
dont forget one of the the greatest weapons the powers that be have, are the words ....." Conspiracy Theory"
your thoughts please
PS as i write this a massive thunderstorm is taking place ...AND THATS TRUE..
mOBSCENE
10-19-05, 07:04 PM
Yes I think 6 billion insignificant beings collectively can have an adverse effect...
xcite-tv
10-19-05, 07:10 PM
prove it
prove it
Thats the thing with theories. You dont have to prove them. They have to be disproved. EG the evolution theory. It isnt proved but it hasnt been disproved.
I wouldnt worry to much about it anyway, the yanks will blow the whole world up before to long :ninja:
mOBSCENE
10-19-05, 08:37 PM
prove it
Prove otherwise...
daveydude
10-20-05, 02:54 AM
Sounds like the usual new-age bullshit to me. The magnetic field thing is real enough, its been pretty much proven that the poles have flipped before. But that stuff about it causing a leap in evolution? Wishful thinking at best.
I have read that the Queen is a reptile, that the holocaust never happened, and that the Earth is only 5000 years old. If something is written down is it true?
xcite-tv
10-20-05, 08:20 AM
Sounds like the usual new-age bullshit to me. The magnetic field thing is real enough, its been pretty much proven that the poles have flipped before. But that stuff about it causing a leap in evolution? Wishful thinking at best.
I have read that the Queen is a reptile, that the holocaust never happened, and that the Earth is only 5000 years old. If something is written down is it true?
See brainwashing does work
the system we live in now is actually new age bullshit
most of the stuff "New age" writers bang on about is crap but its also thousands of years old as for your last paragraph well thats the usual response to anything like this
I didnt say i believed in any of this....I was quoting
xcite-tv
10-20-05, 08:21 AM
Prove otherwise...
I think you missed my point. it was not meant negatively
jesus.....is this a religious thing....
I have read that the Queen is a reptile
sure as hell looks like one to me ;)
daveydude
10-20-05, 10:53 AM
See brainwashing does work
the system we live in now is actually new age bullshit
most of the stuff "New age" writers bang on about is crap but its also thousands of years old as for your last paragraph well thats the usual response to anything like this
I didnt say i believed in any of this....I was quoting
Explain how I'm brainwashed? Because I naturally question a far-fetched claim that has no scientific basis? ;)
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00062J03A.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
xcite-tv
10-20-05, 11:05 AM
Explain how I'm brainwashed? Because I naturally question a far-fetched claim that has no scientific basis? ;)
95% of scientists work for either Government or big corporations
the other 5% usually are branded as mad
religion has no scientific basis but billions believe
xcite-tv
10-20-05, 11:06 AM
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00062J03A.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
the son of God is upon us :lmao2:
have you read that ????
religion has no scientific basis but billions believe
It has some. Lots of things have been found through geology that supports the old and occasionally the new testament. From flood plains to artifacts. As for the new testament. Paul, apostle of jesus, set up the catholic church and you can trace every pope since, right back to the line to Paul himself. So where as god may not be proven and whether you believe or not in god, or believe in jesus being the son of god or not, we pretty much know Jesus did exist. and know that many events in the old testament. did happen and we know it through geology which is a science.
the son of God is upon us :lmao2:
have you read that ????
No but he used to live at Seaview (between Ryde and Bembridge) when he worked for the BBC (pre blue shell-suit period) and he really went off the deep end. His family should have had him sectioned when he proudly announced himself as the messiah back in 1991 (and I bet they tried) and I think that he now spends most of him time in hiding. :)
xcite-tv
10-20-05, 11:26 AM
It has some. Lots of things have been found through geology that supports the old and occasionally the new testament. From flood plains to artifacts. As for the new testament. Paul, apostle of jesus, set up the catholic church and you can trace every pope since, right back to the line to Paul himself. So where as god may not be proven and whether you believe or not in god, or believe in jesus being the son of god or not, we pretty much know Jesus did exist. and know that many events in the old testament. did happen and we know it through geology which is a science.
What you are saying is that there is scientific proof that some events or people existed
What is undesputible is that there are too many religions and beliefs in this world for ANY of them to be right
most religions are based on Pagan beliefs. Christmas and Easter were all in the Pagan calender long before Christianity but the word "Pagan" is now seen as a bad thing
Most religions also believe in some sort of holy trinity
so where is the truth..or scientific evidence that one or all are right
By the way I am a Catholic
and God plays for Liverpool always has done
xcite-tv
10-20-05, 11:29 AM
No but he used to live at Seaview (between Ryde and Bembridge) when he worked for the BBC (pre blue shell-suit period) and he really went off the deep end. His family should have had him sectioned when he proudly announced himself as the messiah back in 1991 (and I bet they tried) and I think that he now spends most of him time in hiding. :)
I think he now spends most of his time in Canada where they listen to anything...
What you are saying is that there is scientific proof that some events or people existed
What is undesputible is that there are too many religions and beliefs in this world for ANY of them to be right
most religions are based on Pagan beliefs. Christmas and Easter were all in the Pagan calender long before Christianity but the word "Pagan" is now seen as a bad thing
Most religions also believe in some sort of holy trinity
so where is the truth..or scientific evidence that one or all are right
By the way I am a Catholic
and God plays for Liverpool always has done
I dont disagree (apart from the Liverpool bit) But I was mearly suggesting that your early coment "religion has no scientific basis but billions believe" was incorrect. Religion does has some science backing up what it says. The basis for all "christian" religions is the bible. Including the holy trinity etc. The basis is the bible, not faith or anything else. Faith is a belief in the bible and in its various interpretations of those teachings. Were as science doesnt yet prove everything in the bible it certainly backs some of what is in there.
By the way I am a Atheist
xcite-tv
10-20-05, 11:43 AM
I am now a born again Atheist
The 12th Planet..
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/038039362X/qid=1129823674/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl/026-4148680-7079633
If you're really interested in this stuff, creation vs evolution etc etc you really should read it.
Based on the translations of ancient tablets found in Sumeria and the bible itself, it's an amazing theory which is hard to find many holes in. Tying together creation and evolution in one fail swoop. (It's only book one of the whole thing but the place to start) Basically God/The Gods were an alien species that came to earth for it's gold and oil resources. After a while they got sick of all the work involved in mining/extracting the resources and decided to create an adam (slave) to do the work for them. They created the adam from genetically modifying the ape stock indigenous to the planet with their own DNA ("made in their image" - the missing link in evolution was the genetic modification)
The sumerians (which is where scientists agree civilization began) say in the tablets that they got the info from the gods themselves. This information includes how the solar system formed and correct details of the planets in the solar system as we know them (with the exception of the missing 12th planet that the gods came from which is on a 3600 year elipitical orbit around the sun and only comes into view when it gets close enough to us) They also have the planets in the right order from outside in as if told by someone who travels into the solar system rather than from the sun outwards (or the earth as the centre as we believed until recent history)
There are a lot of people (Like Mr Icke above) who take some of Sitchin's theories a little far with their reptilian shit and stuff. But if you forget the crackpots and read Sitchin as it's meant, it's highly interesting. Especially as we've now reached a point in our intelligence where we can and do genetic modifications ourselves, is it so hard to believe that at some point in the future we may consider altering animals a little to make them work for us better? (IE implant a little bit more comprehension in chimps or gorillas to make them ameniable and able to follow orders?) Don't we then become "god" who created them? (at least the new species they'd become)
http://www.sitchin.com/
I don't "believe" Sitchin anymore than I "believe" the bible but there are things in both that contribute to the whole. I do believe they both hold some value as to past events on this planet.
xcite-tv
10-20-05, 08:13 PM
The 12th Planet..
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/038039362X/qid=1129823674/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl/026-4148680-7079633
If you're really interested in this stuff, creation vs evolution etc etc you really should read it.
Based on the translations of ancient tablets found in Sumeria and the bible itself, it's an amazing theory which is hard to find many holes in. Tying together creation and evolution in one fail swoop. (It's only book one of the whole thing but the place to start) Basically God/The Gods were an alien species that came to earth for it's gold and oil resources. After a while they got sick of all the work involved in mining/extracting the resources and decided to create an adam (slave) to do the work for them. They created the adam from genetically modifying the ape stock indigenous to the planet with their own DNA ("made in their image" - the missing link in evolution was the genetic modification)
The sumerians (which is where scientists agree civilization began) say in the tablets that they got the info from the gods themselves. This information includes how the solar system formed and correct details of the planets in the solar system as we know them (with the exception of the missing 12th planet that the gods came from which is on a 3600 year elipitical orbit around the sun and only comes into view when it gets close enough to us) They also have the planets in the right order from outside in as if told by someone who travels into the solar system rather than from the sun outwards (or the earth as the centre as we believed until recent history)
There are a lot of people (Like Mr Icke above) who take some of Sitchin's theories a little far with their reptilian shit and stuff. But if you forget the crackpots and read Sitchin as it's meant, it's highly interesting. Especially as we've now reached a point in our intelligence where we can and do genetic modifications ourselves, is it so hard to believe that at some point in the future we may consider altering animals a little to make them work for us better? (IE implant a little bit more comprehension in chimps or gorillas to make them ameniable and able to follow orders?) Don't we then become "god" who created them? (at least the new species they'd become)
http://www.sitchin.com/
I don't "believe" Sitchin anymore than I "believe" the bible but there are things in both that contribute to the whole. I do believe they both hold some value as to past events on this planet.
Thanks will read this
Icke is just someone who reads stuff and copies it and because of his blue tracksuit days people listen.
for those with a Conscience God is inside
Shandy McAndy
10-22-05, 06:33 PM
The 12th Planet..
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/038039362X/qid=1129823674/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl/026-4148680-7079633
If you're really interested in this stuff, creation vs evolution etc etc you really should read it.
Based on the translations of ancient tablets found in Sumeria and the bible itself, it's an amazing theory which is hard to find many holes in. Tying together creation and evolution in one fail swoop. (It's only book one of the whole thing but the place to start) Basically God/The Gods were an alien species that came to earth for it's gold and oil resources. After a while they got sick of all the work involved in mining/extracting the resources and decided to create an adam (slave) to do the work for them. They created the adam from genetically modifying the ape stock indigenous to the planet with their own DNA ("made in their image" - the missing link in evolution was the genetic modification)
The sumerians (which is where scientists agree civilization began) say in the tablets that they got the info from the gods themselves. This information includes how the solar system formed and correct details of the planets in the solar system as we know them (with the exception of the missing 12th planet that the gods came from which is on a 3600 year elipitical orbit around the sun and only comes into view when it gets close enough to us) They also have the planets in the right order from outside in as if told by someone who travels into the solar system rather than from the sun outwards (or the earth as the centre as we believed until recent history)
There are a lot of people (Like Mr Icke above) who take some of Sitchin's theories a little far with their reptilian shit and stuff. But if you forget the crackpots and read Sitchin as it's meant, it's highly interesting. Especially as we've now reached a point in our intelligence where we can and do genetic modifications ourselves, is it so hard to believe that at some point in the future we may consider altering animals a little to make them work for us better? (IE implant a little bit more comprehension in chimps or gorillas to make them ameniable and able to follow orders?) Don't we then become "god" who created them? (at least the new species they'd become)
http://www.sitchin.com/
I don't "believe" Sitchin anymore than I "believe" the bible but there are things in both that contribute to the whole. I do believe they both hold some value as to past events on this planet.
Bit to deep for me :cheers2:
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.